Related Material — 65.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 1591 Q345B (GB/T 1591-2018) and CSA G40.21 400W (CSA G40.21-13 (R2023)) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
GB/T 1591 Q345B is typically used for bridges, construction equipment, cranes, heavy structures, pressure vessels, machinery, while CSA G40.21 400W is commonly used for heavy structural fabrication, bridges, offshore platforms, cranes, pressure vessels, mining equipment..
GB/T 1591 Q345B is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while CSA G40.21 400W is defined under Canadian Standards Association (CSA), originating from Canada.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 1591 Q345B vs CSA G40.21 400W is a 85.1% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 25%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 65.1%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 1591 Q345B
CSA G40.21 400W
Tensile Strength
470-630 MPa
520-690 MPa
Yield Strength
>=345 MPa
400 MPa min
Elongation
>=21%
Not specified
Impact Energy
>=34 J
Not specified
Typical Applications
GB/T 1591 Q345B
bridges, construction equipment, cranes, heavy structures, pressure vessels, machinery
GB/T 1591 Q345B specifies V, Nb, Ti which are not specified for CSA G40.21 400W.
Can GB/T 1591 Q345B Be Substituted With CSA G40.21 400W?
GB/T 1591 Q345B and CSA G40.21 400W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 1591 Q345B and CSA G40.21 400W?
GB/T 1591 Q345B specifies V, Nb, Ti which are not specified for CSA G40.21 400W.
Can GB/T 1591 Q345B be substituted with CSA G40.21 400W?
GB/T 1591 Q345B and CSA G40.21 400W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.