Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 18254 GCr15 (GB/T 18254-2016) and IS 3748 103T3 (IS 3748:1990) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Tool & Die Steels category.
GB/T 18254 GCr15 is typically used for ball bearings, roller bearings, bearing races, while IS 3748 103T3 is commonly used for cold work tools and dies for blanking, trimming, chipping and shearing.
GB/T 18254 GCr15 is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while IS 3748 103T3 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 18254 GCr15 vs IS 3748 103T3 is a 81.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 18254 GCr15
IS 3748 103T3
Hardness HRC (hardened)
60–66
Not specified
Hardness HB (annealed)
≤179–207
Not specified
Hardness
Not specified
<=220 HB
Condition
Not specified
Annealed (maximum Brinell hardness)
Typical Applications
GB/T 18254 GCr15
Ball bearings, roller bearings, bearing races
IS 3748 103T3
Cold work tools and dies for blanking, trimming, chipping and shearing
Key Differences
GB/T 18254 GCr15 specifies Cr which is not specified for IS 3748 103T3.
Can GB/T 18254 GCr15 Be Substituted With IS 3748 103T3?
GB/T 18254 GCr15 and IS 3748 103T3 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 18254 GCr15 and IS 3748 103T3?
GB/T 18254 GCr15 specifies Cr which is not specified for IS 3748 103T3.
Can GB/T 18254 GCr15 be substituted with IS 3748 103T3?
GB/T 18254 GCr15 and IS 3748 103T3 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.