Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 3077 20CrMn (GB/T 3077:2015) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
GB/T 3077 20CrMn is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 3077 20CrMn vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6 is a 70.6% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 3077 20CrMn
IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6
Tensile Strength
>=930 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=735 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=10%
Not specified
Hardness
<=187 HB
Not specified
Condition
Quenched and tempered, test sample 15 mm; hardness is for bars delivered annealed or high temperature tempered
Not specified
Typical Applications
GB/T 3077 20CrMn
Hot-rolled or forged structural alloy steel bars
IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6
Not documented
Key Differences
GB/T 3077 20CrMn specifies P, S, Cu which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6.
Can GB/T 3077 20CrMn Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6?
GB/T 3077 20CrMn and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 3077 20CrMn and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6?
GB/T 3077 20CrMn specifies P, S, Cu which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6.
Can GB/T 3077 20CrMn be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6?
GB/T 3077 20CrMn and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.