Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 3077 40Cr (GB/T 3077:2015) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
GB/T 3077 40Cr is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 3077 40Cr vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4 is a 74.9% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 3077 40Cr
IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4
Tensile Strength
>=980 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=785 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=9%
Not specified
Hardness
<=207 HB
Not specified
Condition
Quenched and tempered, test sample 25 mm; hardness is for bars delivered annealed or high temperature tempered
Not specified
Typical Applications
GB/T 3077 40Cr
shafts, gears, bolts, spindles, connecting rods, machine parts
IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4
Not documented
Key Differences
GB/T 3077 40Cr specifies P, S, Cu which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4.
Can GB/T 3077 40Cr Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4?
GB/T 3077 40Cr and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 3077 40Cr and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4?
GB/T 3077 40Cr specifies P, S, Cu which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4.
Can GB/T 3077 40Cr be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4?
GB/T 3077 40Cr and IS 1570 (Part 4) 103Cr4 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.