Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 700 Q235 (GB/T 700-2006) and AS/NZS 3679.1 350 (AS/NZS 3679.1:2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
GB/T 700 Q235 is typically used for general structural fabrication, bridges, buildings, while AS/NZS 3679.1 350 is commonly used for hot-rolled structural bars and sections for primary structural beams, columns, and framing.
GB/T 700 Q235 is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while AS/NZS 3679.1 350 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 700 Q235 vs AS/NZS 3679.1 350 is a 82.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 700 Q235
AS/NZS 3679.1 350
Tensile Strength
375–500 MPa
480-640 MPa
Yield Strength
≥235 MPa
350 MPa min
Elongation
≥26%
20% min
Typical Applications
GB/T 700 Q235
General structural fabrication, bridges, buildings
AS/NZS 3679.1 350
Hot-rolled structural bars and sections for primary structural beams, columns, and framing
Can GB/T 700 Q235 Be Substituted With AS/NZS 3679.1 350?
GB/T 700 Q235 and AS/NZS 3679.1 350 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 700 Q235 and AS/NZS 3679.1 350?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can GB/T 700 Q235 be substituted with AS/NZS 3679.1 350?
GB/T 700 Q235 and AS/NZS 3679.1 350 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.