Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 700 Q235 (GB/T 700-2006) and ASTM A283C (ASTM A283) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
GB/T 700 Q235 is typically used for general structural fabrication, bridges, buildings, while ASTM A283C is commonly used for used for structural fabrication, storage tanks, buildings, bridges, machinery bases, and welded structures..
GB/T 700 Q235 is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while ASTM A283C is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 700 Q235 vs ASTM A283C is a 83.6% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 700 Q235
ASTM A283C
Tensile Strength
375–500 MPa
380-515 MPa
Yield Strength
≥235 MPa
205 MPa min
Elongation
≥26%
23-27%
Hardness
Not specified
120-170 HB
Typical Applications
GB/T 700 Q235
General structural fabrication, bridges, buildings
ASTM A283C
Used for structural fabrication, storage tanks, buildings, bridges, machinery bases, and welded structures.
Can GB/T 700 Q235 Be Substituted With ASTM A283C?
GB/T 700 Q235 and ASTM A283C share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 700 Q235 and ASTM A283C?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can GB/T 700 Q235 be substituted with ASTM A283C?
GB/T 700 Q235 and ASTM A283C share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.