Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 1435 U10 (GOST 1435-1999) and EN ISO 683-17 100Cr6 (EN ISO 683-17:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Tool & Die Steels category.
GOST 1435 U10 is typically used for used for chisels, punches, files, woodworking tools, and knives., while EN ISO 683-17 100Cr6 is commonly used for rolling element bearings, precision components, cold work tooling.
EN ISO 683-17 100Cr6 is defined under European Standard (EN) (Europe).
As per chemical composition, GOST 1435 U10 vs EN ISO 683-17 100Cr6 is a 82.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 1435 U10
EN ISO 683-17 100Cr6
Tensile Strength
750-900 MPa
≥620 MPa (annealed)
Yield Strength
450 MPa min
Not specified
Elongation
10% min
Not specified
Hardness
60-64 HRC
Not specified
Hardness HRC
Not specified
60–66 (hardened)
Hardness HB
Not specified
179–217 (annealed)
Typical Applications
GOST 1435 U10
Used for chisels, punches, files, woodworking tools, and knives.
EN ISO 683-17 100Cr6
Rolling element bearings, precision components, cold work tooling
Key Differences
EN ISO 683-17 100Cr6 specifies Cr which is not specified for GOST 1435 U10.
Can GOST 1435 U10 Be Substituted With EN ISO 683-17 100Cr6?
GOST 1435 U10 and EN ISO 683-17 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 1435 U10 and EN ISO 683-17 100Cr6?
EN ISO 683-17 100Cr6 specifies Cr which is not specified for GOST 1435 U10.
Can GOST 1435 U10 be substituted with EN ISO 683-17 100Cr6?
GOST 1435 U10 and EN ISO 683-17 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.