Minimal Match — 52.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 4543 40XH (GOST 4543-2016) and GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A (GB/T 3077-2015) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
GOST 4543 40XH is typically used for heavy-duty gears, transmission shafts, axles, high-strength fasteners, forged machinery parts, while GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A is commonly used for used for gears, shafts, pinions, aircraft parts, heavy-duty bearings, and transmission components..
GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T) (China).
As per chemical composition, GOST 4543 40XH vs GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A is a 65.7% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 25%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 52.1%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 4543 40XH
GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A
Tensile Strength
980-1180 MPa
980-1180 MPa
Yield Strength
>=785 MPa
785-980 MPa
Elongation
>=10%
10-14%
Hardness
241-285 HB
58-62 HRC (case)
Typical Applications
GOST 4543 40XH
heavy-duty gears, transmission shafts, axles, high-strength fasteners, forged machinery parts
GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A
Used for gears, shafts, pinions, aircraft parts, heavy-duty bearings, and transmission components.
Key Differences
GOST 4543 40XH specifies Cu which is not specified for GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A.
Can GOST 4543 40XH Be Substituted With GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A?
GOST 4543 40XH and GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 4543 40XH and GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A?
GOST 4543 40XH specifies Cu which is not specified for GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A.
Can GOST 4543 40XH be substituted with GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A?
GOST 4543 40XH and GB/T 3077 12Cr2Ni4A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.