Minimal Match — 41.2% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GOST 5950 9HVG (GOST 5950-2000) and GOST 5950 3H2W8F (GOST 5950-2000) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Tool & Die Steels category.
GOST 5950 9HVG is typically used for used for broaches, taps, dies, punches, and precision cutting tools., while GOST 5950 3H2W8F is commonly used for used for forging dies, extrusion tools, hot punches, mandrels, and die inserts..
As per chemical composition, GOST 5950 9HVG vs GOST 5950 3H2W8F is a 61.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 41.2%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GOST 5950 9HVG
GOST 5950 3H2W8F
Tensile Strength
950-1150 MPa
1400-1700 MPa
Yield Strength
750 MPa min
1200 MPa min
Elongation
7% min
8% min
Hardness
61-65 HRC
45-50 HRC
Typical Applications
GOST 5950 9HVG
Used for broaches, taps, dies, punches, and precision cutting tools.
GOST 5950 3H2W8F
Used for forging dies, extrusion tools, hot punches, mandrels, and die inserts.
Key Differences
GOST 5950 9HVG specifies Mn which is not specified for GOST 5950 3H2W8F.
GOST 5950 3H2W8F specifies V which is not specified for GOST 5950 9HVG.
Can GOST 5950 9HVG Be Substituted With GOST 5950 3H2W8F?
GOST 5950 9HVG and GOST 5950 3H2W8F share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GOST 5950 9HVG and GOST 5950 3H2W8F?
GOST 5950 9HVG specifies Mn which is not specified for GOST 5950 3H2W8F. GOST 5950 3H2W8F specifies V which is not specified for GOST 5950 9HVG.
Can GOST 5950 9HVG be substituted with GOST 5950 3H2W8F?
GOST 5950 9HVG and GOST 5950 3H2W8F share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.