IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr18Ni10Ti vs EN 10088-1 1.4301
Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr18Ni10Ti (IS 11169 (Part 2):1989) and EN 10088-1 1.4301 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr18Ni10Ti is typically used for cold heading and cold extrusion; the standard covers wires, wire rods and bars (clause 1.1), while EN 10088-1 1.4301 is commonly used for food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural, kitchenware.
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr18Ni10Ti is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while EN 10088-1 1.4301 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr18Ni10Ti vs EN 10088-1 1.4301 is a 76.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Frequently Compared With IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr18Ni10Ti:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr18Ni10Ti
EN 10088-1 1.4301
Yield Strength (0.2% proof)
>=205 MPa
Not specified
Tensile Strength
500-750 MPa
≥520 MPa
Elongation
>=40%
≥45%
Impact (U-notch 5 mm)
>=60 J
Not specified
Condition
Quenched reference test piece (Table 6 treatment)
Not specified
Yield Strength
Not specified
≥210 MPa
Hardness
Not specified
≤215 HB
Typical Applications
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr18Ni10Ti
Cold heading and cold extrusion; the standard covers wires, wire rods and bars (clause 1.1)
EN 10088-1 1.4301
Food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural, kitchenware
Key Differences
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr18Ni10Ti specifies Ti which is not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4301.
Can IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr18Ni10Ti Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4301?
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr18Ni10Ti and EN 10088-1 1.4301 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr18Ni10Ti and EN 10088-1 1.4301?
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr18Ni10Ti specifies Ti which is not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4301.
Can IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr18Ni10Ti be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4301?
IS 11169 (Part 2) X04Cr18Ni10Ti and EN 10088-1 1.4301 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.