IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2 vs IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH

Minimal Match — 31.7% match based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.

IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2 (IS 11169 (Part 2):2023) and IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH (IS 1570 (Part 7):1992) are both steel grades. Both fall under the Stainless Steel category. IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2 is typically used for cold heading and cold extrusion of stainless steel parts; the standard covers wires, wire rods and bars of 0.8 to 50 mm (clause 1.1, table 11), while IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH is commonly used for boilers, pressure vessels, steam turbines, steam and water piping and other power plant equipment working at elevated temperature. IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.

As per chemical composition, IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2 vs IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH is a 47.5% match. As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%. Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 31.7%.

Frequently Compared With IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2:
GB/T 3280 06Cr19Ni10 GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 GOST 5632 08X18H10 EN 10088-1 1.4006 EN 10088-1 1.4301 EN 10088-1 1.4401 EN 10088-1 1.4845 IS 1570 (Part 7) 11Cr17Ni13W3TiH IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoH IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12Ni2Mo IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr13H GOST 5632 12Kh13
Match Breakdown
CHEMISTRY MATCH
47.5%
MECHANICAL MATCH
0%
OVERALL
31.7%
Specifications
Property IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2 IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH
Standard IS 11169 (Part 2):2023 IS 1570 (Part 7):1992
Category Stainless Steel Stainless Steel
C (%) <=0.04 0.08-0.16
Cr (%) 16.5-17.5 11.5-13.00
Cu (%) 3.00-3.50 Not specified
Mn (%) <=2.00 0.40-1.00
Mo (%) 2.00-2.50 0.40-0.80
N (%) <=0.10 Not specified
Ni (%) 10.0-11.0 <=1.0
P (%) <=0.045 <=0.040
S (%) <=0.015 <=0.035
Si (%) <=1.00 <=0.60
V (%) Not specified 0.10-0.30
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2 IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH
Reduction of Area, solution annealed (+AT) >=68% (over 5 to 50 mm) Not specified
Tensile Strength, solution annealed (+AT) <=610 MPa (over 5 to 50 mm) Not specified
Tensile Strength Not specified 770-930 MPa
Yield Strength Not specified >=585 MPa (0.2 % proof stress)
Elongation Not specified >=15%
Condition Not specified Bars, forgings, Q+T, thickness up to 150 (first row of Table 3)
Typical Applications
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2
Cold heading and cold extrusion of stainless steel parts; the standard covers wires, wire rods and bars of 0.8 to 50 mm (clause 1.1, Table 11)
IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH
Boilers, pressure vessels, steam turbines, steam and water piping and other power plant equipment working at elevated temperature
Key Differences
Can IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH?
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2 and IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
On M-EX Right Now
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2
0 active listings and RFQs →
IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH
0 active listings and RFQs →
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2 and IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH?
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2 specifies Cu, N which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH. IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH specifies V which is not specified for IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2.
Can IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH?
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr17Ni11Cu3Mo2 and IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr12MoVH share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.