IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr18Ni9Cu3 vs EN 10088-1 1.4006
Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr18Ni9Cu3 (IS 11169 (Part 2):2023) and EN 10088-1 1.4006 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr18Ni9Cu3 is typically used for cold heading and cold extrusion of stainless steel parts; the standard covers wires, wire rods and bars of 0.8 to 50 mm (clause 1.1, table 11), while EN 10088-1 1.4006 is commonly used for cutlery, turbine blades, fasteners, surgical instruments.
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr18Ni9Cu3 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while EN 10088-1 1.4006 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr18Ni9Cu3 vs EN 10088-1 1.4006 is a 57.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Frequently Compared With IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr18Ni9Cu3:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr18Ni9Cu3
EN 10088-1 1.4006
Reduction of Area, solution annealed (+AT)
>=68% (over 5 to 50 mm)
Not specified
Tensile Strength, solution annealed (+AT)
<=590 MPa (over 5 to 50 mm)
Not specified
Tensile Strength
Not specified
≥540 MPa (annealed)
Hardness HRC
Not specified
36–45 (hardened)
Elongation
Not specified
≥18%
Typical Applications
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr18Ni9Cu3
Cold heading and cold extrusion of stainless steel parts; the standard covers wires, wire rods and bars of 0.8 to 50 mm (clause 1.1, Table 11)
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr18Ni9Cu3 specifies Cu, N, P, S which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4006.
Can IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr18Ni9Cu3 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4006?
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr18Ni9Cu3 and EN 10088-1 1.4006 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr18Ni9Cu3 and EN 10088-1 1.4006?
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr18Ni9Cu3 specifies Cu, N, P, S which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4006.
Can IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr18Ni9Cu3 be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4006?
IS 11169 (Part 2) X02Cr18Ni9Cu3 and EN 10088-1 1.4006 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.