Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 55Cr3 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6 (IS 1570 (Part 4):1988) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 4) 55Cr3 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 4) 55Cr3 vs IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6 is a 59.4% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 4) 55Cr3
IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6
Tensile Strength
890-1040 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=650 MPa (0.2 % proof stress)
Not specified
Elongation
>=12%
Not specified
Izod Impact
>=35 J
Not specified
Hardness
255-311 HBS (guidance only)
Not specified
Condition
Wear resisting steel, hardened and tempered, limiting ruling section 63 mm
Not specified
Key Differences
IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6 specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 55Cr3.
Can IS 1570 (Part 4) 55Cr3 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 55Cr3 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 4) 55Cr3 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6 specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for IS 1570 (Part 4) 55Cr3.
Can IS 1570 (Part 4) 55Cr3 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6?
IS 1570 (Part 4) 55Cr3 and IS 1570 (Part 4) 10Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.