Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 5) X04Cr25Ni20 (IS 1570 (Part 5):1985) and EN 10088-1 1.4006 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 5) X04Cr25Ni20 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while EN 10088-1 1.4006 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 5) X04Cr25Ni20 vs EN 10088-1 1.4006 is a 62.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Frequently Compared With IS 1570 (Part 5) X04Cr25Ni20:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 5) X04Cr25Ni20
EN 10088-1 1.4006
Tensile Strength
>=515 MPa
≥540 MPa (annealed)
Yield Strength
>=205 MPa (0.2 % proof stress)
Not specified
Elongation
>=40% (50 mm)
≥18%
Hardness
<=217 HB; <=95 HRB
Not specified
Condition
Annealed, quenched or solution treated plates, sheets and strips (Table 2)
IS 1570 (Part 5) X04Cr25Ni20 specifies P, S which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4006.
Can IS 1570 (Part 5) X04Cr25Ni20 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4006?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X04Cr25Ni20 and EN 10088-1 1.4006 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 5) X04Cr25Ni20 and EN 10088-1 1.4006?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X04Cr25Ni20 specifies P, S which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4006.
Can IS 1570 (Part 5) X04Cr25Ni20 be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4006?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X04Cr25Ni20 and EN 10088-1 1.4006 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.