Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 5) X07Cr17 (IS 1570 (Part 5):1985) and GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 (GOST 5632-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 5) X07Cr17 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS) (India).
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 5) X07Cr17 vs GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 is a 66.3% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Frequently Compared With IS 1570 (Part 5) X07Cr17:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 5) X07Cr17
GOST 5632 06Kh23N28
Tensile Strength
>=450 MPa
≥510 MPa
Yield Strength
>=205 MPa (0.2 % proof stress)
≥196 MPa
Elongation
>=22.0% (50 mm)
≥35%
Hardness
<=183 HB; <=88 HRB
Not specified
Condition
Annealed, quenched or solution treated plates, sheets and strips (Table 2)
Not specified
Max Service Temp
Not specified
1050°C
Typical Applications
IS 1570 (Part 5) X07Cr17
Not documented
GOST 5632 06Kh23N28
Furnace components, heat exchangers, high temperature applications
Key Differences
IS 1570 (Part 5) X07Cr17 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 5632 06Kh23N28.
Can IS 1570 (Part 5) X07Cr17 Be Substituted With GOST 5632 06Kh23N28?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X07Cr17 and GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 5) X07Cr17 and GOST 5632 06Kh23N28?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X07Cr17 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 5632 06Kh23N28.
Can IS 1570 (Part 5) X07Cr17 be substituted with GOST 5632 06Kh23N28?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X07Cr17 and GOST 5632 06Kh23N28 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.