IS 1570 (Part 5) X53Cr22Mn9Ni4N vs IS 1570 (Part 5) X70Cr21Mn6Ni2N
Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 1570 (Part 5) X53Cr22Mn9Ni4N (IS 1570 (Part 5):1985) and IS 1570 (Part 5) X70Cr21Mn6Ni2N (IS 1570 (Part 5):1985) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
IS 1570 (Part 5) X53Cr22Mn9Ni4N is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while IS 1570 (Part 5) X70Cr21Mn6Ni2N is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, IS 1570 (Part 5) X53Cr22Mn9Ni4N vs IS 1570 (Part 5) X70Cr21Mn6Ni2N is a 69.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 100%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Frequently Compared With IS 1570 (Part 5) X53Cr22Mn9Ni4N:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 1570 (Part 5) X53Cr22Mn9Ni4N
IS 1570 (Part 5) X70Cr21Mn6Ni2N
Hardness
>=321 HB
>=321 HB
Condition
Valve steel, hardened and tempered (Table 6)
Valve steel, hardened and tempered (Table 6)
Can IS 1570 (Part 5) X53Cr22Mn9Ni4N Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 5) X70Cr21Mn6Ni2N?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X53Cr22Mn9Ni4N and IS 1570 (Part 5) X70Cr21Mn6Ni2N share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 1570 (Part 5) X53Cr22Mn9Ni4N and IS 1570 (Part 5) X70Cr21Mn6Ni2N?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can IS 1570 (Part 5) X53Cr22Mn9Ni4N be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 5) X70Cr21Mn6Ni2N?
IS 1570 (Part 5) X53Cr22Mn9Ni4N and IS 1570 (Part 5) X70Cr21Mn6Ni2N share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.