Related Material — 65.2% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 2062 E165 (IS 2062:2006) and CSA G40.21 300W (CSA G40.21-13 (R2023)) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
IS 2062 E165 is typically used for structural work: welded, bolted and riveted structures and general engineering purposes, while CSA G40.21 300W is commonly used for structural fabrication,bridges,buildings,machinery frames,general construction,welded structures.
IS 2062 E165 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while CSA G40.21 300W is defined under Canadian Standards Association (CSA), originating from Canada.
As per chemical composition, IS 2062 E165 vs CSA G40.21 300W is a 97.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 65.2%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 2062 E165
CSA G40.21 300W
Tensile Strength
>=290 MPa
450-620 MPa
Yield Strength
165 MPa (all thicknesses)
300 MPa min
Elongation
>=23%
20-23 %
Impact
not required
Not specified
Typical Applications
IS 2062 E165
Structural work: welded, bolted and riveted structures and general engineering purposes
Can IS 2062 E165 Be Substituted With CSA G40.21 300W?
IS 2062 E165 and CSA G40.21 300W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 2062 E165 and CSA G40.21 300W?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can IS 2062 E165 be substituted with CSA G40.21 300W?
IS 2062 E165 and CSA G40.21 300W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.