Related Material — 69.2% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 3195 60Cr4V2 (IS 3195:1992) and BS 970 EN48 (BS 970:1955) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Spring Steel category.
IS 3195 60Cr4V2 is typically used for volute and helical springs for railway rolling stock; flats and rounds, springs worked hot and heat-treated (clause 1.1, foreword), while BS 970 EN48 is commonly used for high duty springs, valve springs.
IS 3195 60Cr4V2 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while BS 970 EN48 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, IS 3195 60Cr4V2 vs BS 970 EN48 is a 69.2% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.2%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 3195 60Cr4V2
BS 970 EN48
Hardness, annealed
<=255 HB
Not specified
Hardness, untreated (hot rolled)
about 310 HB (for guidance only)
Not specified
Typical Applications
IS 3195 60Cr4V2
Volute and helical springs for railway rolling stock; flats and rounds, springs worked hot and heat-treated (clause 1.1, foreword)
BS 970 EN48
High duty springs, valve springs
Key Differences
IS 3195 60Cr4V2 specifies V which is not specified for BS 970 EN48.
Can IS 3195 60Cr4V2 Be Substituted With BS 970 EN48?
IS 3195 60Cr4V2 and BS 970 EN48 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 3195 60Cr4V2 and BS 970 EN48?
IS 3195 60Cr4V2 specifies V which is not specified for BS 970 EN48.
Can IS 3195 60Cr4V2 be substituted with BS 970 EN48?
IS 3195 60Cr4V2 and BS 970 EN48 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.