Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 4367 16Ni8Cr6Mo2 (IS 4367:1991) and UNI 11234 100Cr6 (UNI 11234:2007) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
IS 4367 16Ni8Cr6Mo2 is typically used for gears, camshafts, piston pins, splined shafts, aerospace and automotive case-hardened components., while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is commonly used for ball bearings,roller bearings,needle bearings,dies,punches,gauges,wear resistant components.
IS 4367 16Ni8Cr6Mo2 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is defined under Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione (UNI), originating from Italy.
As per chemical composition, IS 4367 16Ni8Cr6Mo2 vs UNI 11234 100Cr6 is a 64% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 4367 16Ni8Cr6Mo2
UNI 11234 100Cr6
Tensile Strength
1350 MPa min
750-1000 MPa
Elongation
>=9%
10-14 %
Izod Impact
35 J min
Not specified
Hardness (soft annealed)
<=229 HB
Not specified
Condition
Refined, quenched and stress relieved (core properties), ruling section up to 30 mm
IS 4367 16Ni8Cr6Mo2 specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
Can IS 4367 16Ni8Cr6Mo2 Be Substituted With UNI 11234 100Cr6?
IS 4367 16Ni8Cr6Mo2 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 4367 16Ni8Cr6Mo2 and UNI 11234 100Cr6?
IS 4367 16Ni8Cr6Mo2 specifies Ni, Mo which are not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
Can IS 4367 16Ni8Cr6Mo2 be substituted with UNI 11234 100Cr6?
IS 4367 16Ni8Cr6Mo2 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.