Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 5517 40Ni14 (IS 5517:1993) and EN 10084 17CrNi6-6 (EN 10084:2008) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
IS 5517 40Ni14 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while EN 10084 17CrNi6-6 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, IS 5517 40Ni14 vs EN 10084 17CrNi6-6 is a 69.9% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 100%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 5517 40Ni14
EN 10084 17CrNi6-6
Tensile Strength
800-950 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength (0.2% proof)
600 MPa min
Not specified
Elongation
>=16%
Not specified
Izod Impact
55 J min
Not specified
Hardness (annealed)
<=229 HB
Not specified
Condition
Hardened and tempered, ruling section up to 100 mm
Soft annealed
Hardenability
Not specified
+H band at 1.5 mm from the quenched end: 39 to 47 HRC
Hardness
Not specified
Soft annealed: 229 HB max
Typical Applications
IS 5517 40Ni14
Not documented
EN 10084 17CrNi6-6
Case hardened machine parts: carburized or carbonitrided, then hardened (clause 3.1)
Can IS 5517 40Ni14 Be Substituted With EN 10084 17CrNi6-6?
IS 5517 40Ni14 and EN 10084 17CrNi6-6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 5517 40Ni14 and EN 10084 17CrNi6-6?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can IS 5517 40Ni14 be substituted with EN 10084 17CrNi6-6?
IS 5517 40Ni14 and EN 10084 17CrNi6-6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.