IS 6603 X01Cr25Ni21 vs EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoN25-22-2
Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 6603 X01Cr25Ni21 (IS 6603:2024) and EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoN25-22-2 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
IS 6603 X01Cr25Ni21 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoN25-22-2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, IS 6603 X01Cr25Ni21 vs EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoN25-22-2 is a 77% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 6603 X01Cr25Ni21
EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoN25-22-2
Tensile Strength
470-670 MPa
Not specified
Condition
Solution annealed, conditions 1C, 1E, 1D, 1X, 1G and 2D, rod only; Yield Strength is Rp0.2, Elongation is A (longitudinal)
Not specified
Typical Applications
IS 6603 X01Cr25Ni21
General purposes, semi-finished products, bars, wire rods and bright bars
EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoN25-22-2
Not documented
Can IS 6603 X01Cr25Ni21 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoN25-22-2?
IS 6603 X01Cr25Ni21 and EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoN25-22-2 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between IS 6603 X01Cr25Ni21 and EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoN25-22-2?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can IS 6603 X01Cr25Ni21 be substituted with EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoN25-22-2?
IS 6603 X01Cr25Ni21 and EN 10088-1 X1CrNiMoN25-22-2 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.