Close Alternative — 71% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
IS 6603 X02Cr24Ni4Mn3Mo2CuN (IS 6603:2024) and ASTM A959 S32950 (ASTM A959:2011) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
IS 6603 X02Cr24Ni4Mn3Mo2CuN is typically used for general purposes, semi-finished products, bars, wire rods and bright bars, while ASTM A959 S32950 is commonly used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1).
IS 6603 X02Cr24Ni4Mn3Mo2CuN is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India, while ASTM A959 S32950 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, IS 6603 X02Cr24Ni4Mn3Mo2CuN vs ASTM A959 S32950 is a 71% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 71%.
Frequently Compared With IS 6603 X02Cr24Ni4Mn3Mo2CuN:
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
IS 6603 X02Cr24Ni4Mn3Mo2CuN
ASTM A959 S32950
Tensile Strength
>=650 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=450 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=25%
Not specified
Hardness
<=290 HB
Not specified
Condition
Solution annealed, conditions 1C, 1E, 1D, 1X, 1G and 2D, thickness or diameter up to 160 mm; Tensile Strength is a minimum as printed, hardness for guidance only
Not specified
Typical Applications
IS 6603 X02Cr24Ni4Mn3Mo2CuN
General purposes, semi-finished products, bars, wire rods and bright bars
ASTM A959 S32950
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
Key Differences
IS 6603 X02Cr24Ni4Mn3Mo2CuN specifies Cu which is not specified for ASTM A959 S32950.
Can IS 6603 X02Cr24Ni4Mn3Mo2CuN Be Substituted With ASTM A959 S32950?
IS 6603 X02Cr24Ni4Mn3Mo2CuN and ASTM A959 S32950 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between IS 6603 X02Cr24Ni4Mn3Mo2CuN and ASTM A959 S32950?
IS 6603 X02Cr24Ni4Mn3Mo2CuN specifies Cu which is not specified for ASTM A959 S32950.
Can IS 6603 X02Cr24Ni4Mn3Mo2CuN be substituted with ASTM A959 S32950?
IS 6603 X02Cr24Ni4Mn3Mo2CuN and ASTM A959 S32950 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.