Minimal Match — 52% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4051 S35C (JIS G4051:2009) and BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Carbon Steel category.
JIS G4051 S35C is typically used for crankshafts, axles, gears, bolts, while BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10 is commonly used for case hardening steel (section four).
JIS G4051 S35C is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, JIS G4051 S35C vs BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10 is a 78% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 52%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4051 S35C
BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10
Tensile Strength
>=530 MPa
430 MPa min
Elongation
>=19%
18 % min
Hardness
<=167 HB
Not specified
Condition
Not specified
Case hardened, 19 mm test bar
Typical Applications
JIS G4051 S35C
Crankshafts, axles, gears, bolts
BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10
Case hardening steel (section four)
Key Differences
JIS G4051 S35C specifies Si, S, P which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10.
Can JIS G4051 S35C Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10?
JIS G4051 S35C and BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4051 S35C and BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10?
JIS G4051 S35C specifies Si, S, P which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10.
Can JIS G4051 S35C be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10?
JIS G4051 S35C and BS 970 (Part 1) 045A10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.