Related Material — 56.8% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4102 SNC815 (JIS G 4102:1979) and GOST 4543 12HN3A (GOST 4543-2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
JIS G4102 SNC815 is typically used for heavily stressed gears, differential components, while GOST 4543 12HN3A is commonly used for used for gears, pinions, crankshafts, aircraft parts, and transmission components..
JIS G4102 SNC815 is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS) (Japan).
As per chemical composition, JIS G4102 SNC815 vs GOST 4543 12HN3A is a 85.2% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 56.8%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4102 SNC815
GOST 4543 12HN3A
Tensile Strength
≥980 MPa
850-1050 MPa
Case Hardness HRC
60–65
Not specified
Yield Strength
Not specified
685 MPa min
Elongation
Not specified
11% min
Hardness
Not specified
58-62 HRC (case)
Typical Applications
JIS G4102 SNC815
Heavily stressed gears, differential components
GOST 4543 12HN3A
Used for gears, pinions, crankshafts, aircraft parts, and transmission components.
Key Differences
JIS G4102 SNC815 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 4543 12HN3A.
Can JIS G4102 SNC815 Be Substituted With GOST 4543 12HN3A?
JIS G4102 SNC815 and GOST 4543 12HN3A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4102 SNC815 and GOST 4543 12HN3A?
JIS G4102 SNC815 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 4543 12HN3A.
Can JIS G4102 SNC815 be substituted with GOST 4543 12HN3A?
JIS G4102 SNC815 and GOST 4543 12HN3A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.