Close Alternative — 84.2% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4304 SUS301L (JIS G4304:2021) and EN 10088-1 X4CrNiCu18-7 (EN 10088-1:2023) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
JIS G4304 SUS301L is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while EN 10088-1 X4CrNiCu18-7 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, JIS G4304 SUS301L vs EN 10088-1 X4CrNiCu18-7 is a 84.2% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 84.2%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4304 SUS301L
EN 10088-1 X4CrNiCu18-7
Tensile Strength
>=550 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=215 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=45%
Not specified
Hardness
<=207 HB
Not specified
Condition
Solution heat treated plate and strip; 0.2 percent proof strength applies only when specified by the purchaser
Not specified
Typical Applications
JIS G4304 SUS301L
Hot-rolled stainless steel plates and strips
EN 10088-1 X4CrNiCu18-7
Not documented
Key Differences
EN 10088-1 X4CrNiCu18-7 specifies Cu which is not specified for JIS G4304 SUS301L.
Can JIS G4304 SUS301L Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 X4CrNiCu18-7?
JIS G4304 SUS301L and EN 10088-1 X4CrNiCu18-7 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between JIS G4304 SUS301L and EN 10088-1 X4CrNiCu18-7?
EN 10088-1 X4CrNiCu18-7 specifies Cu which is not specified for JIS G4304 SUS301L.
Can JIS G4304 SUS301L be substituted with EN 10088-1 X4CrNiCu18-7?
JIS G4304 SUS301L and EN 10088-1 X4CrNiCu18-7 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.