Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4304 SUS329J3L (JIS G4304:2021) and EN 10088-1 1.4006 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
JIS G4304 SUS329J3L is typically used for hot-rolled stainless steel plates and strips, while EN 10088-1 1.4006 is commonly used for cutlery, turbine blades, fasteners, surgical instruments.
JIS G4304 SUS329J3L is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while EN 10088-1 1.4006 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, JIS G4304 SUS329J3L vs EN 10088-1 1.4006 is a 48.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 33.3%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4304 SUS329J3L
EN 10088-1 1.4006
Tensile Strength
>=620 MPa
≥540 MPa (annealed)
Yield Strength
>=450 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=18%
≥18%
Hardness
<=302 HB
Not specified
Condition
Solution heat treated plate and strip; proof strength applies only when specified by the purchaser
JIS G4304 SUS329J3L specifies P, S, Mo, N which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4006.
Can JIS G4304 SUS329J3L Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4006?
JIS G4304 SUS329J3L and EN 10088-1 1.4006 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4304 SUS329J3L and EN 10088-1 1.4006?
JIS G4304 SUS329J3L specifies P, S, Mo, N which are not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4006.
Can JIS G4304 SUS329J3L be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4006?
JIS G4304 SUS329J3L and EN 10088-1 1.4006 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.