Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4801 SUP6 (JIS G 4801:2005) and EN 10089 55Cr3 (EN 10089:2002) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Spring Steel category.
JIS G4801 SUP6 is typically used for automotive suspension springs, leaf springs, while EN 10089 55Cr3 is commonly used for automotive leaf springs, heavy coil springs.
JIS G4801 SUP6 is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while EN 10089 55Cr3 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, JIS G4801 SUP6 vs EN 10089 55Cr3 is a 77.1% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4801 SUP6
EN 10089 55Cr3
Tensile Strength
≥1130 MPa
1100–1350 MPa
Yield Strength
≥980 MPa
≥1000 MPa
Elongation
≥7%
≥6%
Hardness
341–415 HB
321–388 HB
Typical Applications
JIS G4801 SUP6
Automotive suspension springs, leaf springs
EN 10089 55Cr3
Automotive leaf springs, heavy coil springs
Key Differences
JIS G4801 SUP6 specifies S, P which are not specified for EN 10089 55Cr3.
EN 10089 55Cr3 specifies Cr which is not specified for JIS G4801 SUP6.
Can JIS G4801 SUP6 Be Substituted With EN 10089 55Cr3?
JIS G4801 SUP6 and EN 10089 55Cr3 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4801 SUP6 and EN 10089 55Cr3?
JIS G4801 SUP6 specifies S, P which are not specified for EN 10089 55Cr3. EN 10089 55Cr3 specifies Cr which is not specified for JIS G4801 SUP6.
Can JIS G4801 SUP6 be substituted with EN 10089 55Cr3?
JIS G4801 SUP6 and EN 10089 55Cr3 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.