Related Material — 69.4% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
JIS G4801 SUP9A (JIS G 4801:2005) and BS 970 EN50 (BS 970:1955) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Spring Steel category.
JIS G4801 SUP9A is typically used for heavy duty leaf springs, torsion bars, while BS 970 EN50 is commonly used for annealed wire for oil-hardened and tempered springs; covered by bs 1429..
JIS G4801 SUP9A is defined under Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS), originating from Japan, while BS 970 EN50 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, JIS G4801 SUP9A vs BS 970 EN50 is a 69.4% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.4%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
JIS G4801 SUP9A
BS 970 EN50
Tensile Strength
≥1180 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
≥1030 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
≥7%
Not specified
Typical Applications
JIS G4801 SUP9A
Heavy duty leaf springs, torsion bars
BS 970 EN50
Annealed wire for oil-hardened and tempered springs; covered by BS 1429.
Key Differences
BS 970 EN50 specifies V which is not specified for JIS G4801 SUP9A.
Can JIS G4801 SUP9A Be Substituted With BS 970 EN50?
JIS G4801 SUP9A and BS 970 EN50 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between JIS G4801 SUP9A and BS 970 EN50?
BS 970 EN50 specifies V which is not specified for JIS G4801 SUP9A.
Can JIS G4801 SUP9A be substituted with BS 970 EN50?
JIS G4801 SUP9A and BS 970 EN50 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.