Related Material — 59.6% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
KS D3503 SS400 (KS D 3503:2016) and CSA G40.21 400A (CSA G40.21-13 (R2023)) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
KS D3503 SS400 is typically used for structural fabrication,bridges,buildings,machinery frames,general construction,welded structures,plates,sections, while CSA G40.21 400A is commonly used for atmospheric corrosion-resistant (weathering) structural steel; exposed bridge girders and structural members where high strength and weathering resistance are both needed.
KS D3503 SS400 is defined under Korean Industrial Standards (KS), originating from South Korea, while CSA G40.21 400A is defined under Canadian Standards Association (CSA), originating from Canada.
As per chemical composition, KS D3503 SS400 vs CSA G40.21 400A is a 89.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 59.6%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Atmospheric corrosion-resistant (weathering) structural steel; exposed bridge girders and structural members where high strength and weathering resistance are both needed
Key Differences
CSA G40.21 400A specifies Si, Cu which are not specified for KS D3503 SS400.
Can KS D3503 SS400 Be Substituted With CSA G40.21 400A?
KS D3503 SS400 and CSA G40.21 400A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between KS D3503 SS400 and CSA G40.21 400A?
CSA G40.21 400A specifies Si, Cu which are not specified for KS D3503 SS400.
Can KS D3503 SS400 be substituted with CSA G40.21 400A?
KS D3503 SS400 and CSA G40.21 400A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.