Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
KS D3867 SCM415 (KS D 3867:2025) and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
KS D3867 SCM415 is defined under Korean Industrial Standards (KS), originating from South Korea, while IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, KS D3867 SCM415 vs IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 is a 57.9% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
KS D3867 SCM415
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Tensile Strength
Not specified
380-550 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
225 MPa min
Elongation
Not specified
>=19%
Izod Impact
Not specified
60 J min
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=170 HB
Condition
Not specified
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 40 mm
Typical Applications
KS D3867 SCM415
Gears, shafts, camshafts, piston pins, precision machine components requiring hard surface and tough core.
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6
Not documented
Key Differences
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 specifies Ni which is not specified for KS D3867 SCM415.
Can KS D3867 SCM415 Be Substituted With IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
KS D3867 SCM415 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between KS D3867 SCM415 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 specifies Ni which is not specified for KS D3867 SCM415.
Can KS D3867 SCM415 be substituted with IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6?
KS D3867 SCM415 and IS 4367 07Cr4Mo6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.