Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
NF A35-552 XC38 (NF A35-552:1986) and BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 (BS 970 (Part 1):1983) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Carbon Steel category.
NF A35-552 XC38 is typically used for shafts, pins, connecting rods, machined parts, forgings, agricultural equipment parts, while BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 is commonly used for case hardening steel for mechanical and allied engineering purposes (table 11 mechanical properties)..
NF A35-552 XC38 is defined under Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF), originating from France, while BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, NF A35-552 XC38 vs BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 is a 79.4% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
NF A35-552 XC38
BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10
Tensile Strength
540-680 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
>=320 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
>=17%
Not specified
Hardness
160-200 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
NF A35-552 XC38
shafts, pins, connecting rods, machined parts, forgings, agricultural equipment parts
BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10
Case hardening steel for mechanical and allied engineering purposes (Table 11 mechanical properties).
Key Differences
NF A35-552 XC38 specifies Si which is not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10.
Can NF A35-552 XC38 Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10?
NF A35-552 XC38 and BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between NF A35-552 XC38 and BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10?
NF A35-552 XC38 specifies Si which is not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10.
Can NF A35-552 XC38 be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10?
NF A35-552 XC38 and BS 970 (Part 1) 045M10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.