Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
NF A35-565 100C6 and IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4 (IS 11169 (Part 1):2022) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
NF A35-565 100C6 is typically used for ball bearings, roller bearings, bearing races, rollers, precision tools, wear resistant parts, while IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4 is commonly used for cold heading and cold extrusion of parts that are case hardened; the standard covers bars, wire rods and wires of 2 to 100 mm (clause 1.1, annex b).
NF A35-565 100C6 is defined under Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF), originating from France, while IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, NF A35-565 100C6 vs IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4 is a 62.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Cold heading and cold extrusion of parts that are case hardened; the standard covers bars, wire rods and wires of 2 to 100 mm (clause 1.1, Annex B)
Key Differences
IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4 specifies Cu, Ni which are not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can NF A35-565 100C6 Be Substituted With IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4?
NF A35-565 100C6 and IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between NF A35-565 100C6 and IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4?
IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4 specifies Cu, Ni which are not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can NF A35-565 100C6 be substituted with IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4?
NF A35-565 100C6 and IS 11169 (Part 1) 10Ni5Cr4 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.