Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
NF A35-565 100C6 and IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr9Mo10H (IS 1570 (Part 7):1992) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
NF A35-565 100C6 is typically used for ball bearings, roller bearings, bearing races, rollers, precision tools, wear resistant parts, while IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr9Mo10H is commonly used for boilers, pressure vessels, steam turbines, steam and water piping and other power plant equipment working at elevated temperature.
NF A35-565 100C6 is defined under Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF), originating from France, while IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr9Mo10H is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, NF A35-565 100C6 vs IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr9Mo10H is a 65.6% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Boilers, pressure vessels, steam turbines, steam and water piping and other power plant equipment working at elevated temperature
Key Differences
IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr9Mo10H specifies Mo, Al (metallic) which are not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can NF A35-565 100C6 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr9Mo10H?
NF A35-565 100C6 and IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr9Mo10H share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between NF A35-565 100C6 and IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr9Mo10H?
IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr9Mo10H specifies Mo, Al (metallic) which are not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can NF A35-565 100C6 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr9Mo10H?
NF A35-565 100C6 and IS 1570 (Part 7) 12Cr9Mo10H share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.