Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
NF A35-565 16NC11 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 (IS 4367:1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
NF A35-565 16NC11 is defined under Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF), originating from France, while IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.
As per chemical composition, NF A35-565 16NC11 vs IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 is a 64.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
NF A35-565 16NC11
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10
Tensile Strength
700-900 MPa
410-590 MPa
Yield Strength
450-650 MPa
245 MPa min
Elongation
12-18%
>=18%
Hardness
58-62 HRC (case)
Not specified
Izod Impact
Not specified
55 J min
Hardness (soft annealed)
Not specified
<=187 HB
Condition
Not specified
Normalised and tempered, ruling section up to 50 mm
Typical Applications
NF A35-565 16NC11
Used for gears, pinions, shafts, cam components, transmission parts, and carburized machine elements.
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10
Not documented
Key Differences
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 specifies Mo which is not specified for NF A35-565 16NC11.
Can NF A35-565 16NC11 Be Substituted With IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
NF A35-565 16NC11 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between NF A35-565 16NC11 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 specifies Mo which is not specified for NF A35-565 16NC11.
Can NF A35-565 16NC11 be substituted with IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10?
NF A35-565 16NC11 and IS 4367 10Cr9Mo10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.