Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
NF A35-565 16NC11 and NF A35-565 100C6 are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
NF A35-565 16NC11 is typically used for used for gears, pinions, shafts, cam components, transmission parts, and carburized machine elements., while NF A35-565 100C6 is commonly used for ball bearings, roller bearings, bearing races, rollers, precision tools, wear resistant parts.
NF A35-565 16NC11 is defined under Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF), originating from France, while NF A35-565 100C6 is defined under Association Francaise de Normalisation (NF), originating from France.
As per chemical composition, NF A35-565 16NC11 vs NF A35-565 100C6 is a 65.8% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 18.8%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
NF A35-565 16NC11
NF A35-565 100C6
Tensile Strength
700-900 MPa
850-1100 MPa
Yield Strength
450-650 MPa
Not specified
Elongation
12-18%
Not specified
Hardness
58-62 HRC (case)
60-66 HRC
Typical Applications
NF A35-565 16NC11
Used for gears, pinions, shafts, cam components, transmission parts, and carburized machine elements.
NF A35-565 16NC11 specifies Ni which is not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can NF A35-565 16NC11 Be Substituted With NF A35-565 100C6?
NF A35-565 16NC11 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between NF A35-565 16NC11 and NF A35-565 100C6?
NF A35-565 16NC11 specifies Ni which is not specified for NF A35-565 100C6.
Can NF A35-565 16NC11 be substituted with NF A35-565 100C6?
NF A35-565 16NC11 and NF A35-565 100C6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.