Related Material — 65.7% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
AS/NZS 3679.1 300 (AS/NZS 3679.1:2016) and AS/NZS 1595 C350 (AS/NZS 1595:1998) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is typically used for hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing, while AS/NZS 1595 C350 is commonly used for cold-rolled structural steel sheet; roll-forming, cold-formed structural sections, purlins.
AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand, while AS/NZS 1595 C350 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand.
As per chemical composition, AS/NZS 3679.1 300 vs AS/NZS 1595 C350 is a 98.5% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 65.7%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
AS/NZS 3679.1 300
AS/NZS 1595 C350
Tensile Strength
440-600 MPa
430 MPa min
Yield Strength
300 MPa min
350 MPa min
Elongation
22% min
14% min
Typical Applications
AS/NZS 3679.1 300
Hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing
Can AS/NZS 3679.1 300 Be Substituted With AS/NZS 1595 C350?
AS/NZS 3679.1 300 and AS/NZS 1595 C350 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between AS/NZS 3679.1 300 and AS/NZS 1595 C350?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can AS/NZS 3679.1 300 be substituted with AS/NZS 1595 C350?
AS/NZS 3679.1 300 and AS/NZS 1595 C350 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.