Related Material — 63.8% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A283C (ASTM A283) and CSA G40.21 400W (CSA G40.21-13 (R2023)) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
ASTM A283C is typically used for used for structural fabrication, storage tanks, buildings, bridges, machinery bases, and welded structures., while CSA G40.21 400W is commonly used for heavy structural fabrication, bridges, offshore platforms, cranes, pressure vessels, mining equipment..
ASTM A283C is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while CSA G40.21 400W is defined under Canadian Standards Association (CSA), originating from Canada.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A283C vs CSA G40.21 400W is a 95.6% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 63.8%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A283C
CSA G40.21 400W
Tensile Strength
380-515 MPa
520-690 MPa
Yield Strength
205 MPa min
400 MPa min
Elongation
23-27%
Not specified
Hardness
120-170 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
ASTM A283C
Used for structural fabrication, storage tanks, buildings, bridges, machinery bases, and welded structures.
Can ASTM A283C Be Substituted With CSA G40.21 400W?
ASTM A283C and CSA G40.21 400W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between ASTM A283C and CSA G40.21 400W?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can ASTM A283C be substituted with CSA G40.21 400W?
ASTM A283C and CSA G40.21 400W share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.