Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A283C (ASTM A283) and GOST 19281 09G2S (GOST 19281-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
ASTM A283C is typically used for used for structural fabrication, storage tanks, buildings, bridges, machinery bases, and welded structures., while GOST 19281 09G2S is commonly used for used for bridges, pressure vessels, pipelines, structural frames, and heavy equipment components..
ASTM A283C is defined under ASTM International (United States).
As per chemical composition, ASTM A283C vs GOST 19281 09G2S is a 65.1% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 13.1%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A283C
GOST 19281 09G2S
Tensile Strength
380-515 MPa
490-640 MPa
Yield Strength
205 MPa min
345 MPa min
Elongation
23-27%
21% min
Hardness
120-170 HB
140-190 HB
Typical Applications
ASTM A283C
Used for structural fabrication, storage tanks, buildings, bridges, machinery bases, and welded structures.
GOST 19281 09G2S
Used for bridges, pressure vessels, pipelines, structural frames, and heavy equipment components.
Key Differences
GOST 19281 09G2S specifies Ni, Cr, Cu which are not specified for ASTM A283C.
Can ASTM A283C Be Substituted With GOST 19281 09G2S?
ASTM A283C and GOST 19281 09G2S share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between ASTM A283C and GOST 19281 09G2S?
GOST 19281 09G2S specifies Ni, Cr, Cu which are not specified for ASTM A283C.
Can ASTM A283C be substituted with GOST 19281 09G2S?
ASTM A283C and GOST 19281 09G2S share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.