Close Alternative — 71.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A514 (ASTM A514) and SAE J404 8617 (SAE J404:2000) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
ASTM A514 is typically used for used for cranes, mining equipment, pressure vessels, bridges, heavy trucks, and structural fabrication., while SAE J404 8617 is commonly used for chemistry-only alloy steel grade; see the composition notes for product scope.
ASTM A514 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while SAE J404 8617 is defined under SAE International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A514 vs SAE J404 8617 is a 71.9% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a close alternative overall at 71.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A514
SAE J404 8617
Tensile Strength
760-895 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
690 MPa min
Not specified
Elongation
16-18%
Not specified
Hardness
235-293 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
ASTM A514
Used for cranes, mining equipment, pressure vessels, bridges, heavy trucks, and structural fabrication.
SAE J404 8617
Chemistry-only alloy steel grade; see the composition notes for product scope
Can ASTM A514 Be Substituted With SAE J404 8617?
ASTM A514 and SAE J404 8617 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.
What is the difference between ASTM A514 and SAE J404 8617?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can ASTM A514 be substituted with SAE J404 8617?
ASTM A514 and SAE J404 8617 are a close alternative rather than a direct substitute. Some properties overlap well, but check the specific chemistry and mechanical rows above against your application's requirements before treating them as interchangeable.