Related Material — 68.5% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A588 (ASTM A588) and CSA G40.21 350A (CSA G40.21-13 (R2023)) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel (Corten / Weathering) category.
ASTM A588 is typically used for used for bridges, railway wagons, transmission poles, architectural structures, containers, and outdoor construction., while CSA G40.21 350A is commonly used for exposed structural steelwork, bridges, retaining walls, coastal infrastructure, architectural facades..
ASTM A588 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States, while CSA G40.21 350A is defined under Canadian Standards Association (CSA), originating from Canada.
As per chemical composition, ASTM A588 vs CSA G40.21 350A is a 81.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 42.6%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 68.5%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A588
CSA G40.21 350A
Tensile Strength
485-630 MPa
480-650 MPa
Yield Strength
345 MPa min
350 MPa min
Elongation
18-21%
Not specified
Hardness
140-190 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
ASTM A588
Used for bridges, railway wagons, transmission poles, architectural structures, containers, and outdoor construction.
Can ASTM A588 Be Substituted With CSA G40.21 350A?
ASTM A588 and CSA G40.21 350A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between ASTM A588 and CSA G40.21 350A?
Both grades share a similar composition profile; see the specification table above for the exact chemistry and mechanical property values.
Can ASTM A588 be substituted with CSA G40.21 350A?
ASTM A588 and CSA G40.21 350A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.