Related Material — 62.8% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
ASTM A959 .- (ASTM A959:2011) and GOST 5632 08X18H10 (GOST 5632-2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
ASTM A959 .- is typically used for wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1), while GOST 5632 08X18H10 is commonly used for chemical equipment, food processing, general corrosion resistant applications.
ASTM A959 .- is defined under ASTM International (United States).
As per chemical composition, ASTM A959 .- vs GOST 5632 08X18H10 is a 62.8% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 62.8%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
ASTM A959 .-
GOST 5632 08X18H10
Tensile Strength
Not specified
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
Not specified
≥205 MPa
Elongation
Not specified
≥40%
Typical Applications
ASTM A959 .-
Wrought stainless steel products; recommended composition limits for adoption by product standards (clause 1.1)
GOST 5632 08X18H10
Chemical equipment, food processing, general corrosion resistant applications
Key Differences
ASTM A959 .- specifies Cb, N, Ti which are not specified for GOST 5632 08X18H10.
Can ASTM A959 .- Be Substituted With GOST 5632 08X18H10?
ASTM A959 .- and GOST 5632 08X18H10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between ASTM A959 .- and GOST 5632 08X18H10?
ASTM A959 .- specifies Cb, N, Ti which are not specified for GOST 5632 08X18H10.
Can ASTM A959 .- be substituted with GOST 5632 08X18H10?
ASTM A959 .- and GOST 5632 08X18H10 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.