Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) and EN 10088-1 1.4301 (EN 10088-1:2014) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Stainless Steel category.
BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 is typically used for austenitic stainless and heat resisting steel (section five), while EN 10088-1 1.4301 is commonly used for food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural, kitchenware.
BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom, while EN 10088-1 1.4301 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe.
As per chemical composition, BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 vs EN 10088-1 1.4301 is a 62.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13
EN 10088-1 1.4301
Condition
Softened, 1000-1100 deg C
Not specified
Tensile Strength
490 MPa min
≥520 MPa
Yield Strength
190 MPa min (0.2% proof)
≥210 MPa
Elongation
40 % min
≥45%
Hardness
183 HB max
≤215 HB
Typical Applications
BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13
Austenitic stainless and heat resisting steel (section five)
EN 10088-1 1.4301
Food equipment, chemical vessels, architectural, kitchenware
Key Differences
BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 specifies Mo which is not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4301.
Can BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 Be Substituted With EN 10088-1 1.4301?
BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 and EN 10088-1 1.4301 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 and EN 10088-1 1.4301?
BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 specifies Mo which is not specified for EN 10088-1 1.4301.
Can BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 be substituted with EN 10088-1 1.4301?
BS 970 (Part 1) 316S13 and EN 10088-1 1.4301 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.