Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
DIN 17200 30NiCr11 (DIN 17200:1986) and BS 970 (Part 1) 655H13 (BS 970 (Part 1):1991) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
DIN 17200 30NiCr11 is typically used for used in heavy-duty gears, crankshafts, aircraft parts, shafts, and connecting rods., while BS 970 (Part 1) 655H13 is commonly used for case hardening steel (section four).
DIN 17200 30NiCr11 is defined under Deutsches Institut fur Normung (DIN), originating from Germany, while BS 970 (Part 1) 655H13 is defined under British Standards (BS), originating from United Kingdom.
As per chemical composition, DIN 17200 30NiCr11 vs BS 970 (Part 1) 655H13 is a 70.3% match.
Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
DIN 17200 30NiCr11
BS 970 (Part 1) 655H13
Tensile Strength
900-1100 MPa
Not specified
Yield Strength
700 MPa min
Not specified
Elongation
10-13%
Not specified
Hardness
260-320 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
DIN 17200 30NiCr11
Used in heavy-duty gears, crankshafts, aircraft parts, shafts, and connecting rods.
BS 970 (Part 1) 655H13
Case hardening steel (section four)
Key Differences
DIN 17200 30NiCr11 specifies Si, P, S which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 655H13.
Can DIN 17200 30NiCr11 Be Substituted With BS 970 (Part 1) 655H13?
DIN 17200 30NiCr11 and BS 970 (Part 1) 655H13 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between DIN 17200 30NiCr11 and BS 970 (Part 1) 655H13?
DIN 17200 30NiCr11 specifies Si, P, S which are not specified for BS 970 (Part 1) 655H13.
Can DIN 17200 30NiCr11 be substituted with BS 970 (Part 1) 655H13?
DIN 17200 30NiCr11 and BS 970 (Part 1) 655H13 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.