Related Material — 60.6% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-2 S355J0 (EN 10025-2:2019) and ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50 (ASTM A1008) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
EN 10025-2 S355J0 is typically used for hot rolled products of structural steels, while ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50 is commonly used for cold-rolled high-strength structural steel sheet; automotive structural components, cold-formed parts requiring moderate strength.
EN 10025-2 S355J0 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50 is defined under ASTM International, originating from United States.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-2 S355J0 vs ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50 is a 91% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 60.6%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-2 S355J0
ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50
Tensile Strength
470-630 MPa
380 MPa min
Yield Strength
>=355 MPa
340 MPa min
Elongation
>=22%
14% min
Condition
Nominal thickness up to 16 mm (tensile for 3 to 100 mm, elongation for 3 to 40 mm), longitudinal test pieces
EN 10025-2 S355J0 specifies N, Cu which are not specified for ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50.
Can EN 10025-2 S355J0 Be Substituted With ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50?
EN 10025-2 S355J0 and ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10025-2 S355J0 and ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50?
EN 10025-2 S355J0 specifies N, Cu which are not specified for ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50.
Can EN 10025-2 S355J0 be substituted with ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50?
EN 10025-2 S355J0 and ASTM A1008 SS Grade 50 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.