Related Material — 59.1% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-2 S235J2 (EN 10025-2:2019) and CSA G40.21 400A (CSA G40.21-13 (R2023)) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
EN 10025-2 S235J2 is typically used for used for bridges, structural sections, storage tanks, industrial buildings, transport frames, and support structures., while CSA G40.21 400A is commonly used for atmospheric corrosion-resistant (weathering) structural steel; exposed bridge girders and structural members where high strength and weathering resistance are both needed.
EN 10025-2 S235J2 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while CSA G40.21 400A is defined under Canadian Standards Association (CSA), originating from Canada.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-2 S235J2 vs CSA G40.21 400A is a 88.6% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 0%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 59.1%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-2 S235J2
CSA G40.21 400A
Tensile Strength
360-510 MPa
520-670 MPa
Yield Strength
>=235 MPa
400 MPa min
Elongation
>=26%
17% min
Condition
Nominal thickness up to 16 mm (tensile for 3 to 100 mm, elongation for 3 to 40 mm), longitudinal test pieces
Not specified
Impact
Not specified
27J at 0°C
Typical Applications
EN 10025-2 S235J2
Used for bridges, structural sections, storage tanks, industrial buildings, transport frames, and support structures.
CSA G40.21 400A
Atmospheric corrosion-resistant (weathering) structural steel; exposed bridge girders and structural members where high strength and weathering resistance are both needed
Key Differences
CSA G40.21 400A specifies Si which is not specified for EN 10025-2 S235J2.
Can EN 10025-2 S235J2 Be Substituted With CSA G40.21 400A?
EN 10025-2 S235J2 and CSA G40.21 400A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10025-2 S235J2 and CSA G40.21 400A?
CSA G40.21 400A specifies Si which is not specified for EN 10025-2 S235J2.
Can EN 10025-2 S235J2 be substituted with CSA G40.21 400A?
EN 10025-2 S235J2 and CSA G40.21 400A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.