Related Material — 58.8% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-2 S235JR (EN 10025-2:2019) and AS/NZS 3679.1 350 (AS/NZS 3679.1:2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
EN 10025-2 S235JR is typically used for structural fabrication, bridges, buildings, general engineering, while AS/NZS 3679.1 350 is commonly used for hot-rolled structural bars and sections for primary structural beams, columns, and framing.
EN 10025-2 S235JR is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while AS/NZS 3679.1 350 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-2 S235JR vs AS/NZS 3679.1 350 is a 86.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 3.6%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 58.8%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-2 S235JR
AS/NZS 3679.1 350
Tensile Strength
360-510 MPa
480-640 MPa
Yield Strength
>=235 MPa
350 MPa min
Elongation
>=26%
20% min
Condition
Nominal thickness up to 16 mm (tensile for 3 to 100 mm, elongation for 3 to 40 mm), longitudinal test pieces
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10025-2 S235JR
Structural fabrication, bridges, buildings, general engineering
AS/NZS 3679.1 350
Hot-rolled structural bars and sections for primary structural beams, columns, and framing
Key Differences
EN 10025-2 S235JR specifies N, Cu which are not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 350.
AS/NZS 3679.1 350 specifies Si which is not specified for EN 10025-2 S235JR.
Can EN 10025-2 S235JR Be Substituted With AS/NZS 3679.1 350?
EN 10025-2 S235JR and AS/NZS 3679.1 350 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10025-2 S235JR and AS/NZS 3679.1 350?
EN 10025-2 S235JR specifies N, Cu which are not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 350. AS/NZS 3679.1 350 specifies Si which is not specified for EN 10025-2 S235JR.
Can EN 10025-2 S235JR be substituted with AS/NZS 3679.1 350?
EN 10025-2 S235JR and AS/NZS 3679.1 350 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.