Related Material — 61.6% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
EN 10025-3 S500 (EN 10025-3:2019) and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 (AS/NZS 3679.1:2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Structural Steel category.
EN 10025-3 S500 is typically used for used in heavy structural sections, mining equipment, bridge fabrication, transport vehicles, and offshore structures., while AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is commonly used for hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing.
EN 10025-3 S500 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is defined under Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS), originating from Australia/New Zealand.
As per chemical composition, EN 10025-3 S500 vs AS/NZS 3679.1 300 is a 91.9% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 1%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 61.6%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
EN 10025-3 S500
AS/NZS 3679.1 300
Tensile Strength
590-770 MPa
440-600 MPa
Yield Strength
500 MPa min
300 MPa min
Elongation
16% min
22% min
Hardness
190-240 HB
Not specified
Typical Applications
EN 10025-3 S500
Used in heavy structural sections, mining equipment, bridge fabrication, transport vehicles, and offshore structures.
AS/NZS 3679.1 300
Hot-rolled structural bars and sections for general structural framing
Key Differences
EN 10025-3 S500 specifies Nb, V, Ti which are not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 300.
Can EN 10025-3 S500 Be Substituted With AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
EN 10025-3 S500 and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between EN 10025-3 S500 and AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
EN 10025-3 S500 specifies Nb, V, Ti which are not specified for AS/NZS 3679.1 300.
Can EN 10025-3 S500 be substituted with AS/NZS 3679.1 300?
EN 10025-3 S500 and AS/NZS 3679.1 300 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.