Post Stock Login Register

EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5 vs IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H

Related Material — 64.3% match based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.

EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5 (EN 10088-1:2014) and IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H (IS 1570 (Part 7):1992) are both steel grades. EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5 is classified under Tool & Die Steels, while IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H is classified under Stainless Steel — a different category, which is worth noting alongside the chemistry match below. EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5 is typically used for plastic injection moulds, die casting dies for zinc/aluminium, while IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H is commonly used for boilers, pressure vessels, steam turbines, steam and water piping and other power plant equipment working at elevated temperature. EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5 is defined under European Standard (EN), originating from Europe, while IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H is defined under Bureau of Indian Standards (IS), originating from India.

As per chemical composition, EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5 vs IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H is a 64.3% match. Mechanical property data is not available for both grades, so this factor could not be scored. Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 64.3%.

Frequently Compared With EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5:
EN ISO 4957 1.2316 DIN EN ISO 4957 1.2344 EN ISO 683-17 100Cr6 GB/T 1299 4Cr5MoSiV GOST 5950 4H5MFS1 DIN EN ISO 4957 1.2379 GB/T 1299 4Cr5MoSiV1 GOST 5950 4H5MFS AISI 52100 GOST 5950 3H2W8F GB/T 1299 3Cr2W8V IS 3748 103T3
Match Breakdown
CHEMISTRY MATCH
64.3%
MECHANICAL MATCH
No shared data
OVERALL
64.3%
Specifications
Property EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5 IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H
Standard EN 10088-1:2014 IS 1570 (Part 7):1992
Category Tool & Die Steels Stainless Steel
C (%) ≤0.06 <=0.030
Si (%) ≤0.70 <=1.00
Mn (%) ≤1.50 <=2.00
Cr (%) 15.0–17.0 16.00-18.00
Mo (%) 0.80–1.50 2.00-3.00
Ni (%) 3.50–5.50 10.00-14.00
P (%) Not specified <=0.045
S (%) Not specified <=0.030
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5 IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H
Hardness HRC 28–34 (delivered) Not specified
Hardness HRC (hardened) 38–42 Not specified
Corrosion Resistance Good Not specified
Tensile Strength Not specified 490-690 MPa
Yield Strength Not specified >=185 MPa (0.2 % proof stress)
Elongation Not specified >=30%
Condition Not specified Tubes, plates, Q, thickness - (first row of Table 3)
Typical Applications
EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5
Plastic injection moulds, die casting dies for zinc/aluminium
IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H
Boilers, pressure vessels, steam turbines, steam and water piping and other power plant equipment working at elevated temperature
Key Differences
Can EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5 Be Substituted With IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H?
EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5 and IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
Forms & Sizes Available on M-EX
EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5
Round Bar → (2 listings)
Diameter: 80–80 mm (3.15–3.15 in)
Length: 3700–4000 mm (145.67–157.48 in)
IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H
No active listings currently.
On M-EX Right Now
EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5
2 active listings and RFQs →
IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H
0 active listings and RFQs →
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5 and IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H?
Different category: EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5 is Tool & Die Steels, IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H is Stainless Steel. IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H specifies P, S which are not specified for EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5.
Can EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5 be substituted with IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H?
EN 10088-1 X4CrNiMo16-5 and IS 1570 (Part 7) 3Cr17Ni12Mo3H share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.