Related Material — 69.9% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 (GB/T 3077-2015) and GOST 4543 12HN3A (GOST 4543-2016) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 is typically used for used for gears, shafts, pinions, crankshafts, transmission parts, and heavy-duty couplings., while GOST 4543 12HN3A is commonly used for used for gears, pinions, crankshafts, aircraft parts, and transmission components..
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T) (China).
As per chemical composition, GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 vs GOST 4543 12HN3A is a 84.4% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 43.5%.
Combined, this makes them a related material overall at 69.9%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6
GOST 4543 12HN3A
Tensile Strength
880-1080 MPa
850-1050 MPa
Yield Strength
685-880 MPa
685 MPa min
Elongation
10-14%
11% min
Hardness
58-62 HRC (case)
58-62 HRC (case)
Typical Applications
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6
Used for gears, shafts, pinions, crankshafts, transmission parts, and heavy-duty couplings.
GOST 4543 12HN3A
Used for gears, pinions, crankshafts, aircraft parts, and transmission components.
Key Differences
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 4543 12HN3A.
Can GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 Be Substituted With GOST 4543 12HN3A?
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 and GOST 4543 12HN3A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 and GOST 4543 12HN3A?
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 specifies P, S which are not specified for GOST 4543 12HN3A.
Can GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 be substituted with GOST 4543 12HN3A?
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 and GOST 4543 12HN3A share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.