Minimal Match — 35% match
based on chemical composition and mechanical property overlap.
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 (GB/T 3077-2015) and UNI 11234 100Cr6 (UNI 11234:2007) are both steel grades.
Both fall under the Alloy Steel category.
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 is typically used for used for gears, shafts, pinions, crankshafts, transmission parts, and heavy-duty couplings., while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is commonly used for ball bearings,roller bearings,needle bearings,dies,punches,gauges,wear resistant components.
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 is defined under Guobiao Standards (GB/T), originating from China, while UNI 11234 100Cr6 is defined under Ente Nazionale Italiano di Unificazione (UNI), originating from Italy.
As per chemical composition, GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 vs UNI 11234 100Cr6 is a 69% match.
As per mechanical properties, the match is 42.4%.
Combined, this makes them a minimal match overall at 35%.
Matched by chemical composition and mechanical properties, not a formal equivalence claim. Always verify against the applicable standard before substitution.
Mechanical Properties
Property
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6
UNI 11234 100Cr6
Tensile Strength
880-1080 MPa
750-1000 MPa
Yield Strength
685-880 MPa
400-600 MPa
Elongation
10-14%
10-14 %
Hardness
58-62 HRC (case)
60-64 HRC
Typical Applications
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6
Used for gears, shafts, pinions, crankshafts, transmission parts, and heavy-duty couplings.
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 specifies Ni which is not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
Can GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 Be Substituted With UNI 11234 100Cr6?
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.
What is the difference between GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 and UNI 11234 100Cr6?
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 specifies Ni which is not specified for UNI 11234 100Cr6.
Can GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 be substituted with UNI 11234 100Cr6?
GB/T 3077 15CrNi6 and UNI 11234 100Cr6 share some compositional similarity but differ enough that substitution should not be assumed. Review the differences above carefully, and consult the applicable standard or a metallurgist before using one in place of the other.